Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 12, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06454Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JERYKA ANN JOHNSON, Case No. 19-cv-06454-VC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING ANDREW SAUL, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 19, 23 Jeryka Johnson contends that the ALJ improperly discounted the opinions of two of her treating physicians that, if accepted, would prove that Johnson is disabled and thus entitled to Supplemental Security Income and Child Disability Benefits. Johnson is correct at least as to Dr. Laxer, the only doctor who need be considered for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Trevizo v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Farley v. ColvinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  5. Fagocki Ex Rel. Johnson v. Algonquin/Lake-In-The-Hills Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API