Sibley v. County of Pine
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the county of Pine, (impleaded with Don L. Willard, late county treasurer, and the trustees of school-district No. 3,) from ■a judgment of the district court for that county, McCluer, J., presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The facts as found are that William Barrett, an attorney and counsellor at law, had, under the statute, (Gen. St. 1878, c. 88, § 16,) a lien for his compensation upon a judgment procured by him in favor of one Don L. Willard against school-district No. 3, *202of Pine county, to the full amount of such judgment, of which fact he had duly notified the judgment debtor. He then assigned his claim, together with his 'lien upon the judgment, to the plaintiff. Subsequently, in December, 1878, the school-district, supposing the defendants owned the judgment, paid the amount to them, and received what…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brand v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Wickliffe's Executors v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- State v. StaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Davis v. BilslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Leask v. HoaglandNew York Supreme Court · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.