Legal Opinion
Henry v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 25, 1996No. 95-2134-JWLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Anne Henry and Richard Ralls bring this action as a result of a consumer report or investigative consumer report al*57legedly prepared at the request and direction of the Resolution Trust Corp (RTC), the predecessor of defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Plaintiffs maintain that defendant’s actions violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. Three motions are presently before the court: defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 69); plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file second amended complaint…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Cox v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Pan v. BaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Wesley v. Don Stein Buick, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Sender v. Porter (In Re Porter McLeod, Inc.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Rebecca Maycher v. Muskogee Medical Center Auxiliary, a Nonprofit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.