Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Hoffman
Summit County Court of Common Pleas
Decided February 2, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HUNSICKER, J.
The plaintiff’s petition is for divorce and alimony. She has obtained service by publication on her husband, the defendant, Robert W. Hoffman. The Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and the Prudential Insurance Company of America were made parties defendant to the action under the provisions of §11995, GC. The property sequestered is adequately described in the petition as a policy of insurance issued by each-of the separate defendants, to the said Robert W. Hoffman. With the filing of the petition, the injunctive process of the court issued thereon, as prayed lor.
Each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Foulks v. FoulksOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Whitelaw v. WhitelawOhio Court of Appeals · 1952