Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Burton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1973No. 12001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

This is a lawsuit brought by Dr. N. Jay Rogers, an optometrist practicing in Beaumont, against the members of the Texas Optometry Board, with its principal office in Austin.

By his suit plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment construing a specified portion of Article 4552-5.11, Vernon’s Anno.Civ.Stat-utes, a part of the Texas Optometry Act, which became effective September 1, 1969. (Acts 1969, 61st Leg. p. 1298, ch. 401)

The general effect of subsection (b) of Article 4552 — 5.11 is to afford certain optometry establishments occupying premises under leases in effect on April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calvert v. KadaneTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zeidman v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Heard v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Tarry Moving & Storage Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Tarry Moving & Storage Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colorado Interstate Corporation Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. The Cit Group/equipment Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Texans to Save the Capitol, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Digby v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Four Bros. Boat Works, Inc. v. S & SF, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Colorado Interstate Corp. v. CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API