Colorado Interstate Corp. v. CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs and defendant both move for summary judgment, asserting that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that judgment can enter as a matter of law. The issues were adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially assist their resolution. Defendant contends that plaintiffs have an “absolute and unconditional” obligation to pay rent. I agree and grant summary judgment for defendant.
On November 27, 1985, plaintiffs Colorado Interstate Corporation and Colorado Interstate Gas Company (collectively “Colorado Interstate”)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- West Virginia, Department of Finance & Administration v. Hassett (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Stewart v. United States Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Southwest Park Outpatient Surgery, Ltd. v. Chandler Leasing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- American Lease Plan v. Ben-Kro CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Colorado Interstate Corporation Colorado Interstate Gas Company v. The Cit Group/equipment Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Benedictine College, Inc. v. Century Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994