Martin v. Rutledge
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action of Contract to recover the value of hay. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the April Term, 1919, Essex County, Stanton, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.
This is an action of general assumpsit to recover the value of hay cut by the plaintiff in the summers of 1915 and 1916 on a farm then owned by him.
It appears that the plaintiff and one Harrison were tenants in common of the hay cut in 1916 and that Harrison conveyed his interest therein to W. H. Worthen and F. D. and D. T. Gilman.
The defendant claims, and the plaintiff does not dispute, that F. D. Gilman sold the hay cut in 1916 and a small quantity cut the year previous, it being all the.hay on the plaintiff’s farm, to the defendant. The defendant drew the hay to his farm and fed it to his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hamlin v. . SearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- McLeod v. DespainOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Moore v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Ellis's Admr. v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Bates v. German Commercial Accident Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Firemen's Insurance v. ButcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Manatee Loan & Mortgage Co. v. Manley's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Parker Et Ux. v. ConeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Standard Oil Co. of New York v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.