Legal Opinion

HF & S. COMPANY v. American Standard, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 6, 1972No. Civ. A. W-3856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WESLEY E. BROWN, Chief Judge.

This is a treble damage action filed under Section 4 of the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C. § 15], the jurisdictional basis for which is found under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1337, entitled “Commerce and anti-trust regulations.” It is before the Court on the motion of the defendant for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., Title 28 U.S.C.

The defendant is a corporation existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal office in New York City, New York. Defendant has done and is presently…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Hiland Dairy, Inc., Reiss Dairy, Inc., and Sunny Hill Farms Dairy Company, Inc. v. The Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Jack Malamud v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Coca-Cola Company v. Howard Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API