Chopra v. Display Producers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
This motion for summary judgment raises the issue of whether an employee who is covered by a collective bargaining agreement with an arbitration provision is required to arbitrate her sexual harassment and discrimination claims prior to filing suit under Title VII. Because I find that such an employee need not first submit her claims to arbitration, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Madhu Chopra worked as an assembly line worker for defendant Display Producers, Inc. (“Display Producers”) from sometime in 1982 to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Watts v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Cruz v. Local 32BJDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Medina v. Waste Connections of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019