Legal Opinion
Boise Cascade Corp. v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Utah
Decided March 24, 1978No. C 76-374PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALDON J. ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is presently before the court on the motions for summary judgment of the plaintiff and of the defendant railroad companies, and the motion to dismiss of the defendant United States. Inasmuch as the motion to dismiss of defendant United States is based in part upon Rule 12(b)(6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and matters outside of the pleadings have been presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion to dismiss shall be treated as one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Packer v. BirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jamestown & Northern Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Himonas v. Denver & R. G. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- B & S Holdings, LLC v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2012
- Boise Cascade Corporation v. Union Pacific Railroad Company San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Marshall v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1992