Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1993No. 93-1335PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered to serve a one-year suspension from the practice of law in Ohio, with such suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. MargolisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GittingerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. GarfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API