Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lash
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1993No. 93-1335PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the board’s findings and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered to serve a one-year suspension from the practice of law in Ohio, with such suspension to have begun on February 19, 1992. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
2Cited by9 opinions
- In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MargolisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GittingerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. GarfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.