Pinshaw v. Metropolitan District Commission
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
Following the decision in Pinshaw v. Metropolitan Dist. Commn., 402 Mass. 687 (1988), in which a divided court reversed a summary judgment for the defendant Met*734ropolitan District Commission (MDC), this case was tried in the Superior Court. At the trial, the plaintiff, Alan Pinshaw, acting under an assignment of rights to indemnification1 from Frederick Monk, an MDC police officer, sought recovery of damages and fees previously awarded Pinshaw in a civil rights suit he had filed against Monk in the United States District Court. In the Federal suit, Pinshaw had alleged that Monk had initiated a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boice-Perrine Co. v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Pinshaw v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- DeJesus v. YogelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Narkin v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Stacy Marie Vincent v. Louis Marx & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petrell v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Carney v. TranfagliaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Gagne v. O'DonoghueMassachusetts Superior Court · 1996
- Yerrick v. KelleyMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
- Nardone v. Cambridge HospitalMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998