Legal Opinion
State v. Darst
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1965No. 37216, 37238PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
The prosecuting attorney for King County, by information, accused Patricia Ann Hudson and Robert Thomas Darst jointly in two counts with unlawfully uttering false or forged prescriptions on April 7 and 8, 1963, for a narcotic drug known as dilaudid. Miss Hudson entered a plea of guilty to count 1 on July 5, 1963, and, pursuant to a deferred sentence granted July 26, 1963, served a jail term and was placed on probation. Thereupon, the court dismissed count 2 against her on motion by the state. Robert Thomas Darst, after Miss Hudson entered a plea of guilty, but prior to the order deferring…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. PicheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BaxterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. CreachWashington Supreme Court · 1969
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.