Legal Opinion
Donaciano CARINO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA BOARD OF REGENTS, Defendants-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1984No. 82-1152PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This is an employment discrimination action. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (1982). Plaintiff, Mr. Carino, a naturalized citizen of the United States, was born in the Republic of the Phillipines. Prior to his employment with the defendants, Mr. Carino was a member of the United States Navy. As a result of Mr. Carino’s national origin, he has a noticeable accent. Record, vol. 1, at 132.
Mr. Carino alleged before the trial court that the defendants had made employment decisions adverse to him solely because of his national origin.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Nada Raad v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dorothy Willner v. University of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Manuel T. Fragante v. City and County of Honolulu Eileen Anderson Peter Leong Dennis Kamimura George Kuwahara Kalani McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.