Legal Opinion

Clark v. Dasso

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1876PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Wayne Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Oh. J:

This Aras an action of trespass brought for the cutting and carrying aAvay of certain shade trees Avhich had bden preserved by the plaintiff in a certain avenue’ fronting his premises in the toAvnship of SpringAvells. The avenue Avas seventy feet in Aridth. There Arere sixteen of the trees, íavo of Avhich stood near the center of the avenue, Avith a traveled road on each side, and the majority of the others stood Arithin ten feet of the fence bordering the avenue. The defendant Hynes Avas higliAvay commissioner. ' He testified that one Barkham,. a resident of the toAvn, told him…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clinkenbeard v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mayor of Frostburg v. WinelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. People's Ice Co. v. The Steamer "Excelsior."Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Fockler v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API