Legal Opinion

Southwestern Settlement & Development Co. v. Stanburg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1923No. 892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Sabine County; V. H. Stark, Judge. Trespass to try title by the Southwestern Settlement & Development Company and others ^'against Charley Stanburg and ¡wil’e. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a boundary line suit instituted by appellants against appellees in the' form of trespass to try title, and in which appellees answered by a plea of not guilty. N

The question involved was the true location on the ground of the south boundary line of Texas & New Orleans section 12, in Sabine county, Tex. Appellees contend that this line is located 222 varas north of the north line of the Jacks survey, and on this theory they purchased from the state, as vacant land, the strip lying between the north boundary line of the Jacks and the south boundary line of section No. 12, referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Houston Oil Co. v. ChoateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Harris v. MusgraveTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Cockrell v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Temple Lumber Co. v. FeltsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Barnes v. WingateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Dilworth v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API