Legal Opinion
Gipson v. KAS Snacktime Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 21, 1994No. 4:91CV1827SNLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LIMBAUGH, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action alleging that he was harassed and demoted on the basis of race. Plaintiff alleges that his immediate supervisor subjected him to harassment and verbal abuse, unfairly evaluated his job performance, unfairly disciplined him, and was instrumental in the final decision to demote him solely due to the plaintiffs race. Plaintiff further alleges that defendant’s management personnel were aware of the racial harassment and failed to take proper steps to eliminate it. Plaintiff has brought suit pursuant to Title VII of the Civil…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Loren Johnson v. Minnesota Historical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George L. Gipson v. Kas Snacktime CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- George L. Gipson v. Kas Snacktime Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996