Krieger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARR, J.
Appellant Krieger appeals from a judgment entered on his complaint denying him damages and a permanent injunction to prevent respondent Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PGandE) from lining a section of its Upper Utica “Canal” with a concrete-like substance known as “gunite.” PGandE also cross-complained for damages and injunctive relief to prevent Krieger from appropriating water from the ditch in question for his own use. Krieger likewise appeals from the judgment on the cross-complaint assessing $100 compensatory and $100 punitive damages for water wrongfully appropriated by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010