Legal Opinion

Krieger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1981No. Civ. 19456PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARR, J.

Appellant Krieger appeals from a judgment entered on his complaint denying him damages and a permanent injunction to prevent respondent Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PGandE) from lining a section of its Upper Utica “Canal” with a concrete-like substance known as “gunite.” PGandE also cross-complained for damages and injunctive relief to prevent Krieger from appropriating water from the ditch in question for his own use. Krieger likewise appeals from the judgment on the cross-complaint assessing $100 compensatory and $100 punitive damages for water wrongfully appropriated by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Broder v. Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. MoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Allen v. San José Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Felsenthal v. WarringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. SARALE v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API