Legal Opinion

Golding v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 2001No. Record 000142PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENIOR JUSTICE STEPHENSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal presents the question whether there exists between the parties to an underlying action at law a binding contract to settle the action.

I

The underlying law action involved the sale of an appraisal business. Robert K. Floyd, Jr., and Richard J. Varney were to purchase the business through Floyd & Varney, L.L.C. (collectively, Floyd and Varney) from Billie A. Golding. When the sale failed to transpire, Floyd and Varney opened their own appraisal business, and Golding filed suit.

The parties agreed to mediate their dispute,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Amos v. CoffeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. W. F. Magann Corp. v. Virginia-Carolina Electrical Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Snyder-Falkinham v. StockburgerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. James v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Shepherd v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Viriginia Elec. v. Northern Virginia Reg.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Patel v. BarotDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014
  5. Quadros & Associates v. City of HamptonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API