Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Whigham

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 26, 1988No. 70042PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

525 So.2d 873 (1988)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner,

v.

Roger E. WHIGHAM, Respondent.

No. 70042.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 26, 1988.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee and David R. Ristoff, Branch Staff Counsel, Tampa, for petitioner.

Harry M. Hobbs of the Law Offices of Harry M. Hobbs, Tampa, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of a referee's report finding attorney Roger E. Whigham guilty of professional misconduct arising from Whigham's mismanagement of trust accounts. The respondent has previously…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Florida Bar v. WhighamSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Valentine-MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. The Florida Bar v. NeuSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. The Florida Bar v. RiggsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  4. The Florida Bar v. AdlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Florida Bar v. RoussoSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API