Legal Opinion

State v. Francis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1975No. 43589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issue in this case is whether an uncounseled pre-Argersinger (Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 32 L. Ed. 2d 530, 92 S. Ct. 2006 (1972)) conviction for a traffic offense can be considered in license revocation proceedings under the Washington Habitual Traffic Offenders Act. RCW 46.65. We hold that the use of the traffic convictions involved herein are not barred by Argersinger and affirm the decisions of the trial courts.

The appellants were each found by trial courts to be habitual traffic offenders. The most recent traffic convictions of each appellant, which precipitated the several…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Berry v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Martin P. Marston v. R. M. Oliver, Superintendent of the Virginia State FarmCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. Whorley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. State v. PonceWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Upward v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. State v. DurnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  5. State v. PonceWashington Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API