Legal Opinion
Regency Transportation Group, Ltd. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 2012No. 223 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McCULLOUGH.
Regency Transportation Group, Ltd. (Regency) petitions for review of the January 14, 2011, order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) denying Regency’s exceptions and objection and adopting as modified the initial decision and order of an administrative law judge (ALJ), which concluded that the Commission was not preempted by federal law from collecting the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009-2010 assessment from Regency for intrastate passenger service. We affirm.
The facts as found by the ALJ and adopted by the Commission may be summarized as follows.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Estate of RyerssCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Alex's Transportation, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Kozak v. Hillsborough Public Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
- Kozak v. Hillsborough County, Fla.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Transportation Union, Pennsylvania State Legislative Board v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Snyder Brothers, Inc. v. PA PUC PA Independent Oil & Gas Association v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Snyder Brothers, Inc. v. PA PUC PA Independent Oil & Gas Association v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017