Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1946No. Appeal, 162PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Steen,

A jury having found defendant, David Brooks, guilty of murder in the first degree, with penalty of death, he now appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed upon him.

The facts of the case are these. Brooks having stolen a revolver, met one Albert Wooding at about seven o’clock on the evening of December 14, 1945, and the two of them entered the hardware store of Thomas J. Burnby at 1930 Columbia Avenue, Philadelphia. According to defendant they had “decided to take a chance of going in to see whether or not he had any money” and they “intended it to be a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. StabinskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Goersen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Commonwealth v. FloodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. BarnettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. BarnhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. WoodingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API