Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Scharer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1968No. Docket 3,844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented is whether the defendant Ray A. Scharer, who accepted an assignment of a contract without express assumption of his assignor’s unperformed obligations under the contract, is obliged to pay and perform such unperformed obligations of his assignor.

A written “Lease Agreement (with option to purchase)” dated November, 1964, between the plaintiff, Freeman Keyes, as lessee, and J. W. Bramlett and W. Van Gorp (hereinafter Bramlett-Van Gorp), as lessors, stated that in exchange for plaintiff’s payment of $1,500 to Bramlett-Van Gorp the latter leased to the plaintiff the “1965…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Krueger v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Plaza Investment Co. v. AbelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Daniels v. PARKEROregon Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Mutual Life Assurance Company of America v. Deer Creek Park, Burnac Mortgage Investors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Norton v. First Federal SavingsArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Harte-Hanks Direct Marketing/Baltimore, Inc. v. Varilease Technology Finance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Lone Star Gas Co. v. Mexia Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Roger J. Au & Son, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API