Legal Opinion
Crescent Amusement Co. v. Scott
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1949No. 7 Div. 969PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
The complaint below contained two-counts, each alleging that defendant, through its agents or servants acting within the line and Scope of their employment, “unlawfully caused plaintiff to be arrested and imprisoned on a charge of disorderly conduct for one day, viz, on the 25th day of November, 1946.”
Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint being overruled, pleading was in short by consent.. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, damages being assessed by the jury at' $1000.00. Judgment was. duly entered by the court pursuant to said verdict.
Its motion for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rich v. McInernySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Continental Casualty Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Wood v. HackerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Deadman v. Valley Nat. Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Smith v. ButtonRichmond County Circuit Court · 1997
- Grant v. Dolgen Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Crescent Amusement Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949