Legal Opinion

TQY Investments v. Rodgers Co.

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided October 22, 1991No. Case No. (Chancery) 121734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Thomas J. Middleton

On November 5,1990, Rodgers Company, Inc. (“Rodgers”) filed a memorandum of mechanic’s lien against Bogle Group II (“Bogle”). Bogle subsequently changed its name to TQY, the petitioner in this case. TQY, in its Petition to Determine the Validity of the Mechanic’s Lien, contends that the lien is invalid for the following reasons:

The written notice given to Bogle was insufficient;

The error in the affidavit accompanying the memorandum was fatal to perfection of the lien;

Rodgers is time-barred from enforcing the lien;

The description of the property included three acres…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West Alexandria Properties, Inc. v. First Virginia Mortgage & Real Estate Investment TrustSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Hicks v. Roanoke Brick Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. United Masonry, Inc. v. Jefferson Mews, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Rosser v. ColeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  5. Phillips v. Rector & Visitors of the University of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashco Int'l, Inc. v. Westmore Shopping Ctr. Assocs.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 1997
  2. Davenport Insulation of Harrisonburg, Inc. v. AliffRockingham County Circuit Court · 1999
  3. Heritage Contracting, L.L.C. v. VasquezFairfax County Circuit Court · 2010
  4. Smith v. Adelphia Cable CommunicationsRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API