Legal Opinion

Harland Enterprises, Inc. v. Commander Oil Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur D. Spatt, J.

This is a motion by defendant Town of North Hempstead (Town), pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7), to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the defendant Town of North Hempstead.

BACKGROUND AND CONTENTIONS

This is an action to recover damages for the negligence of the defendant Commander Oil Corp. in performing repair service upon plaintiff Holland’s oil burner (first cause of action) and for the negligence of the Westbury Fire Department of the Westbury Fire District in extinguishing or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Town of IrondequoitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Miller v. Town of IrondequoitNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Thomas v. Consolidated Fire District No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cuddy v. Town of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. Cox v. Village of GreenwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greater Poughkeepsie Library District v. Town of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Village of BronxvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API