Legal Opinion

Ticktin v. Verunac

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 24, 1965No. Gen. 50,382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

In a nonjury contract action, judgment was entered against all defendants for $1,600, and they have appealed. Plaintiff has filed a cross appeal seeking an additional $500.

Plaintiff now files a motion to strike defendants’, abstract for failure to comply with the court rules governing same, to strike defendants’ report of proceedings for failure to file it on time, and to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the record on time. Needless to say, allowance of the motion to dismiss would render the other motions inconsequential, but we wish to comment briefly thereon in passing.

Supreme Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hambley v. ConroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  2. Sparacino v. FeronaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oak Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Portock v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. First Finance Co. v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. Henry v. WazAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API