SCOTLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS v. Locklear
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
The superior court correctly concluded that the Commission erred in applying N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 96-14(2) and (2a) rather than § 96-14(2b) to Locklear’s claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission did not make sufficient findings of fact for this Court to engage in effective appellate review of the issues presented under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(2b), and this matter is remanded for further findings of fact.
I. Procedural and Factual Background
The record in this matter reveals the following: The Scotland County Schools (employer) hired Donna Locklear (claimant) as a lat*195eral-ent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Matter of BoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Matter of UserySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. Paul's Young Men's Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- SCOTLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009