Legal Opinion

SCOTLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS v. Locklear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 2009No. COA08-795PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The superior court correctly concluded that the Commission erred in applying N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 96-14(2) and (2a) rather than § 96-14(2b) to Locklear’s claim for unemployment benefits. The Commission did not make sufficient findings of fact for this Court to engage in effective appellate review of the issues presented under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 96-14(2b), and this matter is remanded for further findings of fact.

I. Procedural and Factual Background

The record in this matter reveals the following: The Scotland County Schools (employer) hired Donna Locklear (claimant) as a lat*195eral-ent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Electric Supply Co. of Durham, Inc. v. Swain Electrical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Matter of BoldenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Matter of UserySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Employment Security Commission v. Paul's Young Men's Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SCOTLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API