Legal Opinion
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Reclamation Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 28, 1933No. 12767PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATTIMORE, Justice.
Prior to June 13, 1925, appellee had been, running its gas containing casinghead gasoline to the plant which appellant had bought -before that date, and on said date appellee contracted to run all its gas from its well to appellant during the life of the well. The pertinent clauses of the contract are:
“V. I-Iumble Oil & Refining Company contracts and agrees, at reasonable intervals, and at least once every ninety days, at the request of The Reclamation Company, to make physical tests'of the casinghead gas collected and gathered by it from The Reclamation Company’s well upon…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- San Jacinto Oil Co. v. Fort Worth Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Dublin Electric & Gas Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Metropolitan Casualty Co. of New York v. Medina Rural High School Dist. No. 5Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- A. L. Wolff & Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wright v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Skaggs v. HeardDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
- Col-Tex Refining Co. v. Coffield & Guthrie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Vaughan v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Webb v. British American Oil Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.