Legal Opinion
Lemkin v. Gulde
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarcus G. Christ, J.
Motion by the defendants, the Bardee Corporation and Hempstead Medical Arts Co., a copartnership, for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action of the complaint. Cross motion by the plaintiffs to amend the complaint.
The plaintiff, Robert Lemkin, is a dentist. Since 1954 he has been a tenant in a building- formerly owned by the corporate defendant but presently owned by the copartnership defendant. The premises are in the Village of Hemstead, abutting the northeast side of the Long Island Railroad tracks and the easterly side of Hilton Avenue.
The second cause of action alleges…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Phillips v. . West Rockaway Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ball v. GradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Hofmann v. HofmannNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Hofmann v. Hofmann, Sunwood Homes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lemkin v. GuldeNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Feigen v. Green Harbour Beach Club, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Rainbow Shop Patchogue Corp. v. Roosevelt Nassau Operating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Franklin v. Rumsey Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Rainbow Shop Patchogue Corp. v. Roosevelt Nassau Operating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.