Gessner v. Ramwell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■Holcomb, J.
— In this action for rather slight personal injuries, the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence for appellant at the conclusion of his case was sustained, on the ground that appellant assumed the risk of injury as a matter of law, and the action was dismissed. This appeal results.
Appellant was a stevedore, working aboard ship in Everett, and being in maritime employment, was not able to recover industrial insurance compensation. At the time of the accident, he was engaged in stowing lumber in the hold of a steamship in Everett. Lumber carriers usually contain more than one…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lynch v. Ninemire Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Lewinn v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Cole v. Spokane Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
- Brandon v. Globe Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cummins v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Kahlstrom v. International Stevedoring Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926