Legal Opinion
Orison F. McDonald II and Herbert Darrell Bomar v. Bill Burrows, Sheriff of Wichita County, Texas, the State of Texas, and the State of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1984No. 83-1619, 83-1636 and 83-1731PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:
Two persons who reside in Texas were criminally charged by the State of Minnesota for violation of Minnesota securities laws and ordered extradited by the Governor of Texas. They seek habeas corpus on the ground that their federal constitutional rights would be violated by their extradition because the Minnesota criminal proceeding was instituted to collect a private debt and as a result of private spleen against them, and because they were denied alleged constitutional rights to a speedy disposition of the extradition proceedings. One of them also asserts that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Elijah Ephraim Jhirad v. Thomas E. Ferrandina, United States Marshal, Southern District of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Wilson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Timothy J. Judd v. George A. Vose, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Frank Ray Chewning v. Russell RogersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. CooperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Enstar Energy, Inc. v. Anderton (In Re First Texas Petroleum, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.