Legal Opinion

Beals v. Wagener

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Eyan, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $1,267.10 for plaintiff, who had appealed from the disallowance, by the probate court, of the claim when presented against the estate of ■defendant’s intestate.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

The question in this case is, was an account stated between the intestate of the plaintiff and the intestate of the ■defendant established ? The plaintiff’s intestate was James B. Beals, an attorney-at-law, who for a series of years had rendered services as such to John Wagener, the defendant’s intestate, and during part of the time the latter had at different times sold coal to Beals. In Au*490gust, 1887, Wagener presented to Beals bis account for the coal, and asked him for a statement of his account. Beals made out his account, crediting upon it Wagener for, the sum of the account rendered by…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Parsons v. SegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Henry v. Le MoyneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API