Legal Opinion

Cafre v. Lockwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Engene L. Lockwood, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of ¡New York on the 1st day of February, 1897, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 25th day of February, 1897, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

The action was brought to recover an agreed stun which was alleged to be due from the defendant to the plaintiff by reason of the sale to the defendant of certain hemp twine in the early part of the year 1894. The defendant admitted the contract to sell to him hemp twine, hut he denied that such goods were delivered to him, and he set up as a counterclaim that the property delivered to him was not such as the plaintiff agreed to sell, but was of a wholly inferior quality; that the plaintiff warranted the goods to be hemp twine; that the defendant, relying on the warranty, received…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coplay Iron Co. (Ltd.) v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Smith v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Bartlett v. . HoppockNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Mayor, Lane & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. McKeige v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Ellner v. PriestleyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1902
  4. George v. CrowderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  5. Larrowe Milling Co. v. Lyons Beet Sugar Refining Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API