Legal Opinion

Monticello School District No. 25 v. George L.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 16, 1996No. 96-1765PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

On March 15, 1995, the plaintiff and counter-defendant Montieello School District No. 25 (the “School District”) filed a complaint to vacate the Level II hearing officer’s decision of November 21, 1994. That decision approved a Level I hearing officer’s finding that the School District’s Individualized Education Program (“IEP-1”), developed February 23, 1994, for Brock L., a student with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”), did not provide him with a “free appropriate public education” (“FAPE”) within the meaning of the Individuals with Disabilities…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morton Community Unit School District No. 709 v. J.M., a Minor, and M.M. And S.M., Individually and as Parents and Next Friends of J.M.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. W.L.G. v. Houston County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
  3. Monticello School District No. 25 v. George L.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. School District of Wisc9onsin Dells v. Z.S.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2001
  5. Petrovich v. Consolidated High School District 230District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API