Goliger v. AMS Properties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, J.
AMS Properties, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Seventy-eight-year-old Mary Goliger (Goliger or mother) had hip surgery in November 2000. During her recuperation, she moved to Tarzana Rehabilitation Center, a 24-hour residential health care facility owned by appellant AMS Properties, Inc. (AMS or the center). Goliger’s daughter, Ruth Binshtock, signed the center’s admission form as a “responsible party” for her mother. According to the form, a “ ‘Responsible Party’ means Ruth Binshtock,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Benasra v. MarcianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Pagarigan v. Libby Care Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dickerson v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Ruiz v. PodolskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Cleveland v. MannMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
- Flores v. Evergreen at San Diego, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Correia v. NB Baker Elec., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.