Shimer v. Traub
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
It is the law in this State that a cause of action for breach of warranty of title to real estate does not arise until there has been an ouster or eviction of the grantee or grantees under a superior title. Sprinkle v. Reidsville, 235 N.C. 140, 69 S.E. 2d 179; Cedar Works v. Lumber Co., 161 N.C. 603, 77 S.E. 770; Fishel v. Browning, 145 N.C. 71, 58 S.E. 759; Wiggins v. Pender, 132 N.C. 628, 44 S.E. 362, 61 L.R.A. 772; Ravenal v. Ingram, 131 N.C. 549, 42 S.E. 967; Griffin v. Thomas, 128 N.C. 310, 38 S.E. 903. Therefore, since the complaint filed in this action does not allege an ouster or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrus v. St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wiggins v. Pender.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Sprinkle v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Griffin v. Thomas.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Fishel v. BrowningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fritts v. GerukosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Fisher v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Metropolitan Group, Inc. v. Meridian Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Smith v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961