Legal Opinion
United States v. David Finn Pearce, United States of America v. Stacey Lee Pearce, A/K/A Stacy Lee Allen, A/K/A Stacey Lee Ray
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1995No. 94-5673, 94-5688PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Senior Judge YOUNG joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
David and Stacey Pearce were found guilty under 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(5) for knowingly possessing document-making implements, with the intent that the implements be used in the production of false identification documents. Both defendants claim that there was insufficient evidence to convict them and that the district court’s supplemental jury instruction with respect to an element of the crime was erroneous. They also challenge the district…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Cynthia Wellington, Guardian of the Estate of Robert D. Gravelle v. Brian L. Daniels, Darrel W. Stephens and City of Newport News, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Giuliano GiuntaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Willie HortonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. DAVID C. HUGHES, —Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael KlopfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Lee Vernell JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.