Legal Opinion
National Carbon Co. v. Richards & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 10, 1936No. 327PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The patents in suit relate to improvements in adsorptive carbon and the process of making the same. The defendants are not charged with infringement of the patented process, but with infringement of certain product claims by the use of infringing carbon in their business. One of the defendants, the Zapon Company, has succeeded to the assets and liabilities of the other, Richards & Co. Inc., and they have successively owned and operated a plant in Stamford, Conn., for the manufacture of pyroxylin coated fabrics and lacquers. In the process of coating fabrics valuable…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Merrell Soule Co. v. Powdered Milk Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Baker v. KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Horne v. George H. Hammond Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1895
- Cambria Iron Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wolfe v. National Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Adolph Gottscho, Inc. v. American Marking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1944
- Amusement Corp. v. MattsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Wolfe v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959