Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 2000No. CR 00-562PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lavenski R. Smith, Justice.

Eddie Eugene Thompson appeals the revocation of his suspended sentences by the Sebastian County Circuit Court. Thompson argues that the trial court based its decision on insufficient evidence. Thompson unsuccessfully appealed his revocation to the court of appeals. The appellate court held that his failure to make a directed-verdict motion at the close bf the State’s evidence pursuant to Rule 33.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure caused his insufficiency of the evidence argument not to be preserved. On Thompson’s petition, we granted review because the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Brunson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Mullinax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Lemons v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Pyle v. SayersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Bond v. Lavaca School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Fayetteville Diagnostic Clinic, Ltd. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Seamster v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API