Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Dixon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2007No. 33095PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the Defendants in a medical malpractice ease entered after granting summary judgment on the ground that the opinion of the Plaintiffs expert was inadmissible because of the lack of foundation showing that the expert had knowledge of the applicable local standard of care. We affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In September 1998, a cardiologist in Idaho Falls diagnosed Rene Ramos with a left ventricular hypertrophy with an intraventricular gradient, which condition placed Ramos at increased risk for death due to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dulaney v. St. Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Swallow v. Emergency Medicine of Idaho, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Gubler v. BoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. JI Case Company v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Shane v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Kerr, M.D, Silk Touch LaserIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Mattox v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bybee v. GormanIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Winn v. CampbellIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hei v. HolzerIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API