State v. DeWitt
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrant, Presiding Judge
In this case we hold that police officers responding to a burglary-in-progress may reasonably enter the residence without a warrant to search for suspects and protect the occupants and their property. I most certainly concur in that holding. We also hold that once the officers have secured the premises, they may not reenter unless additional exigent circumstances arise, or they obtain valid consent or a search warrant. I also concur in this holding. However, the majority goes beyond this to uphold a “confirmatory search” based on People v. Duncan, 42 Cal.3d 91, 227 Cal.Rptr. 654, 720 P.2d 2…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.