Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. DeWitt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 18, 1994No. 1 CA-CR 92-0916Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrant, Presiding Judge

In this case we hold that police officers responding to a burglary-in-progress may reasonably enter the residence without a warrant to search for suspects and protect the occupants and their property. I most certainly concur in that holding. We also hold that once the officers have secured the premises, they may not reenter unless additional exigent circumstances arise, or they obtain valid consent or a search warrant. I also concur in this holding. However, the majority goes beyond this to uphold a “confirmatory search” based on People v. Duncan, 42 Cal.3d 91, 227 Cal.Rptr. 654, 720 P.2d 2…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API