Legal Opinion

People v. Sallis

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1993No. 92CA0569PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

In this prosecution for sexual assault on a child, the People appeal from a ruling of the trial court limiting the scope of cross-examination of defendant, Daniel V. Sallis, II, and from a ruling concerning the procedure followed in that cross-examination. We disapprove the rulings.

Defendant, a friend of the victim’s mother, was accused of sexually assaulting the victim, a young boy, after having invited him on a motorcycle ride.

At trial, as a means to assist him in deciding whether to testify in his own defense, defendant requested a ruling as to the permissible scope…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HavensSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. MozeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. LanphearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Charles F. Leeper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SantanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  2. People v. ScarlettColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. MarionColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. People v. MoranColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Jefferson v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API