Legal Opinion

People v. Lanphear

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1980No. Docket Nos. Crim. 20934, 21167PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*821Opinion

MANUEL, J.

Defendant Ronald Eugene Lanphear appeals from a judgment imposing the death penalty following his conviction of first degree murder. He also seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on allegations of ineffective representation by appointed trial counsel. The proceedings have been consolidated. We find no reversible error affecting the verdict of guilt or the finding of special circumstance. Challenged actions of trial counsel appear to be the product of informed tactical choices within the range of reasonable competence, and the trial court committed no prejudicial error in its…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. GhentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API