Harris v. Ingalls
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Bill in Equity, by tbe executors of tbe will of Josiah G-Graves, late of Nashua, praying for direction as to the execution of the provisions of the will. The will is the same that was considered upon a former transfer. Harris v. Ingalls, ante, 35. The same facts are now transferred, together with some additional facts which, so far as material to the questions considered, appear in the opinion. Transferred from the May term, 1907, of' the-superior court by Peaslee, J.
1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.
The second and third questions submitted are the same in substance as the third question submitted upon the former transfer: whether the plaintiffs have authority to distribute any part of the residue of the estate before the last annual payment to a legatee falls due. This question has been fully answered (Harris v. Ingalls, ante, 38); and no new fact is now submitted, and no reason has been suggested or has occurred to the court, which requires a change of the answer.
The first question submitted is, whether the plaintiffs have authority under the residuary clause of the will to sell and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- Sears v. ChoateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Mellen v. . MellenNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hobson v. . HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Greenland v. . WaddellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Estate of SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- In Re McGovern's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1926
- Estate of LoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Upton v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
- In Re Estate of OppeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.