Legal Opinion

Black & Decker (US), Inc. v. Smith

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided July 11, 2008No. 07-1201PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.

On November 15, 2007, the Plaintiff, Black & Decker, Inc., (“B & D”) filed the instant action against the Defendant, Timothy Smith, alleging that Smith shared certain confidential data with one of the Plaintiffs competitors in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 et seq., the Tennessee Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-25-1701, and the Tennessee Personal and Commercial Computer Act of 2003, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-602. B & D also includes claims…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Grindstaff v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ajuba International, L.L.C. v. SahariaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
  2. Cardinal Health 414, Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
  3. NCMIC Finance Corporation v. ArtinoDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  4. Orbit One Communications, Inc. v. Numerex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. United States v. AleynikovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API