Legal Opinion
Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 9, 1946No. 23171-GPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
In 1943, plaintiff, a corporate agency of the United States created pursuant to the authority contained in Section 5d of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act, as amended by Act of June 25, 1940, 15 U.S.C.A. § 606b, initiated and prosecuted a plan known as the “Idle Tire Purchase Plan.” Its purpose was to create a stock pile of used and spare automobile tires in aid of the national defense. On March 1, 1943, having accumulated a quantity of tires and tubes in Sacramento, California, plaintiff contracted with defendant Lawrence Warehouse Company, a corporation…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Orcutt v. Century Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Brahms v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Lawrence Warehouse Co. v. Defense Supplies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. 37.15 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. California · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.