Legal Opinion
Gene Rettig v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 11, 1984No. 84-5260PublishedCited by 91 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALD, Circuit Judge.
Saverio Ramputi and Herta Rettig had each worked for over thirty-five years for their employer, Lidz Brothers, Inc., when the company went out of business in 1978. Because the company’s pension plan had insufficient assets to cover their vested benefits, the plaintiffs along with other plan participants turned to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) to guarantee coverage of the benefits under the plan termination insurance provision of Title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1390. The PBGC, however, determined…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation v. United States Department of the Interior, American Iron and Steel Institute, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Abourezk v. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Maurine M. Holt v. William W. WinpisingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.