Legal Opinion

Damman v. Bancroft

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, twelfth district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtTbttax, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, who was the attorney for the defendant’s wife, to recover compensation for services rendered by him as such attorney in an action for separation brought by the defendant’s wife, and also to recover compensation for services rendered by him for the defendant’s wife in securing the possession of property belonging to the defendant’s wife, which property was held by the defendant.

The evidence shows that while the proceedings in the action for separation were pending an order for $150 .counsel fee was made in behalf of the plaintiff in that action, that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Naumer v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Naumer v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Hays v. LedmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elder v. RosenwasserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923
  2. Turner v. WoolworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Zipser v. HardyNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Browne v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Troback v. Troback, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API